M1A1遇到T14，你怎么看？
We know the Abrams is a good tank because it has a 3 decade track record of excellent performance that earned it the right to bill itself the best tank in the world.Proven reliability
We know the Armata is a great tank because... because... ummmm.Actually, we don't know any such thing.All we have is basically the equivalent of the manufacturer's brochure saying "this is a really, really, really good tank, guys.Honest!" echoed by the Russian government iterating that it's a good tank.
Question mark
No objective outsider has assessed the Armata's performance and whether it actually delivers what the Russians claim it delivers.Is the engine reliable?Who knows.Is the software good?Beats me.Does it handle great?Your guess is as good as mine.How about crew comfort?Shrug.Adequate protection?I dunno.Accurate gun?Maybe, or maybe not.
Claiming the Armata is a competitor for world's greatest tank based on the available info is no different than believing a new car make/ model is awesome just because its manufacturer released a TV ad saying it's an awesome car. 没经历实战考验的设备、臆想演戏的战法，鬼知道有乜毛病。
光比较参数毫无意义，美国人的M1生产线都停了好久了
美国的战术就不是坦克对射，敌方坦克应该有空中力量主要负责解决，坦克主要起到支援引导步兵作战的作用。 这篇文章想说个啥，就是我对这个坦克一无所知，谁TM知道行不行啊，一辆新坦克出来就吹牛逼，谁信啊，哈哈，不过未免有点不严谨了 反应快，信息化，装甲和动力都好，不是好坦克是啥啊。
不过不知道烧不烧机油。。。
页:
[1]