既然都挺关注WTO的评审的，那就来点硬货吧。

zerowing

全英文：文章源自WTO关方发表的总结。是否喜欢因人而异，只转载实际情况。

Chairperson's concluding remarks:

This seventh Trade Policy Review of China has allowed us to take a closer look at the trade and economic policies of China and to deepen our understanding of developments in those policies since its previous Review in 2016. I would like to thank, once again, Vice Minister Wang Shouwen and his delegation for their constructive engagement throughout this exercise. I would also like to thank the discussant, Ambassador Chambovey, Permanent Representative of Switzerland at the WTO, for his insightful and comprehensive remarks; and the 70 delegations which have taken the floor for their active participation.

In their interventions, Members highlighted the importance of China's contribution to global growth over recent years and noted that the pace of its economic expansion has been moderating recently, prompting the authorities to rebalance growth by focusing on quality and sustainability rather than quantity.

Members generally expressed appreciation for China's active role in the WTO. China being the world's biggest merchandise trader and one of the largest recipients of FDI, its policies have a direct impact on the global economy. Hence, Members called upon China to assume the increased responsibility linked with being a major player in the multilateral trading system. Members also appreciated China's contribution to ongoing discussions on recent initiatives, such as e-commerce, MSME, and investment facilitation for development. Members also noted China's further involvement in regional trade agreements.

Members commended China on its recent reform initiatives aimed at broadening market access and investment opportunities, the greater involvement of the private sector in the economy, and its commitment to fossil fuel subsidy reform. Members appreciated China's ongoing reform of customs procedures, such as further use of single windows, and commitments in the Trade Facilitation Agreement. Regarding the TFA, Members encouraged China to implement all its category B commitments within the specified transition period. Several Members commended China on the Belt and Road Initiative and viewed it as an avenue for mutual cooperation and growth; some invited China to follow international best practices and adhere to a level-playing field for trade and investment opportunities for all. Members also commended China's recent announcements of liberalization in financial services and tariff reductions in the automobile sector. China was congratulated for providing far-ranging preferences to products from LDCs. Many Members expressed appreciation for China's support and assistance to developing countries in areas such as Aid for Trade.

While many Members appreciated China's continued liberalization of its foreign investment regime, they also encouraged China to further enhance access conditions for foreign investors. In this respect, concerns were raised regarding joint venture requirements, and also with regards to what some perceived as being inconsistent and unpredictable regulatory practices and technology transfer requirements.

In their interventions many Members expressed serious concerns about the preponderant role of the State in general, and of state-owned enterprises in particular. Some Members felt that State influence in China's economy has increased in various sectors. Many Members were of the view that China would require a more market-oriented approach to investment and resource allocation.

Members raised questions about China's support and subsidy policies and local content requirements, including those that may be part of the 2025 plan. Some Members noted the importance of enforcing competition policy, particularly in view of the recent amendment to the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Members looked forward to China's early accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement, while several Members also noted continuous issues in China's IPR regime and encouraged continued IPR protection and enforcement. Some Members called for more predictability regarding market price support and public stockpiling measures used for certain agricultural products. Other areas of concern raised by Members included: administrative licensing and approval process, inconsistency in certain sanitary and phytosanitary measures, restrictions on certain agricultural products, cross-border data restriction and data localization requirements, the scope and impact of China's cybersecurity legislation and restriction of Virtual Private Network services, restrictive measures in certain services sectors such as tourism, and industrial policies in certain manufacturing sectors, including the production of new energy vehicles. Several Members also referred to what they perceived to be market-distorting policies resulting in excess capacity in some sectors, such as steel and semi-conductors. China was called upon to help address global overcapacity in these sectors.

As in the previous Review, China was encouraged to increase transparency of its trade policy regime. Members highlighted the importance of fulfilling all WTO commitments, in particular the notification obligations concerning, for example, subsidies (including those on fisheries), agricultural support, and state-trading enterprises. In this regard, Members welcomed the statement by China's representative regarding the recent submission of China's subsidy notification. Members encouraged China to publish all laws, regulations and other measures related to trade, and to make them available in one of the WTO official languages. In this context, Members hoped that sufficient time would be given for comments before the introduction of new regulations.

China has received more than 1,900 advance written questions, and has already responded to most of them. This TPR will be successfully concluded in a month's time, when China replies to all outstanding questions. I am confident that China has taken good note, not only of the well-deserved praise that it received during this meeting, but also of the critical comments that emerged in the course of this TPR. I hope that China will find Members' comments useful and constructive in its pursuit of economic and trade reforms.

附上大概的翻译：

第七次中国贸易政策审查使我们能够更深入地了解中国的贸易和经济政策，并加深了对自2016年上次审议以来这些政策发展的理解。我再次感谢副总理王守文部长及其代表团在整个演习中进行了建设性的参与。我还要感谢讨论者，瑞士常驻世贸组织代表尚博维大使所作的富有洞察力和全面的评论;和70个代表团发言，他们积极参与。

成员们在发言中强调了近年来中国对全球增长的贡献的重要性，并指出中国经济扩张的步伐最近有所放缓，促使当局通过关注质量和可持续性而非数量来重新平衡增长。

成员们普遍对中国在世贸组织中的积极作用表示赞赏。中国是世界上最大的商品贸易商，也是最大的外国直接投资接受国之一，其政策对全球经济产生直接影响。因此，成员们呼吁中国承担与成为多边贸易体系主要参与者相关的更多责任。成员们还对中国对最近举措的讨论表示赞赏，这些举措包括电子商务，MSME和投资便利化促进发展。成员们还注意到中国进一步参与了区域贸易协定。

成员们赞扬中国最近的改革举措，旨在扩大市场准入和投资机会，私营部门更多地参与经济，以及致力于化石燃料补贴改革。成员们赞赏中国正在进行的海关程序改革，例如进一步使用单一窗户，以及“贸易便利化协定”中的承诺。关于TFA，成员鼓励中国在规定的过渡期内履行其所有B类承诺。一些成员赞扬中国的“一带一路”倡议，并将其视为相互合作和发展的途径;一些人邀请中国遵循国际最佳实践，并坚持为所有人提供贸易和投资机会的公平竞争环境。成员们还赞扬中国最近宣布的金融服务自由化和汽车行业的关税削减。中国对最不发达国家的产品提供了广泛的偏好表示祝贺。许多成员对中国在贸易援助等领域对发展中国家的支持和援助表示赞赏。

虽然许多成员赞赏中国继续放开外国投资体制，但也鼓励中国进一步改善外国投资者的准入条件。在这方面，人们对合资企业的要求以及一些人认为不一致和不可预测的监管做法和技术转让要求提出了担忧。

在他们的发言中，许多成员对国家，特别是国有企业的优势作用表示严重关切。一些成员认为，国家对中国经济的影响在各个部门都有所增加。许多成员认为，中国需要更加以市场为导向的投资和资源配置方法。

成员们对中国的支持和补贴政策以及当地的内容要求提出了质疑，包括可能是2025年计划的一部分。一些成员指出了执行竞争政策的重要性，特别是考虑到最近对“反不正当竞争法”的修订。成员期待中国尽早加入“政府采购协议”，而一些成员也注意到中国知识产权制度的持续问题，并鼓励继续保护知识产权和执法。一些成员呼吁在市场价格支持和某些农产品使用的公共储存措施方面提高可预测性。成员提出的其他关注领域包括：行政许可和批准程序，某些卫生和植物检疫措施的不一致，对某些农产品的限制，跨境数据限制和数据本地化要求，中国网络安全立法的范围和影响以及对虚拟专用网服务，某些服务部门（如旅游业）的限制性措施，以及某些制造业部门的产业政策，包括新能源汽车的生产。一些成员还提到了他们认为是市场扭曲的政策，导致某些部门的产能过剩，例如钢铁和半导体。中国被要求帮助解决这些行业的全球产能过剩问题。

与上次审议一样，中国受到鼓励，以提高其贸易政策制度的透明度。成员们强调了履行世贸组织所有承诺的重要性，特别是关于补贴（包括渔业补贴），农业支持和国营贸易企业的通知义务。在这方面，成员们欢迎中国代表就最近提交中国补贴通知的声明。成员鼓励中国公布与贸易有关的所有法律，法规和其他措施，并以世贸组织的一种官方语言提供。在这方面，成员们希望在引入新条例之前有足够的时间进行评论。

中国已收到超过1,900份预先提出的书面问题，并且已经回复了大部分问题。 这个TPR将在一个月内成功结束，届时中国将回答所有悬而未决的问题。 我相信，中国不仅在会议期间得到了当之无愧的赞扬，而且还注意到本次TPR过程中出现的批评意见。 我希望中国在追求经济和贸易改革方面发现议员的意见是有用和有建设性的。

黄海是我

也没什么干货，基本上通篇场面话