机械荟萃山庄

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 4201|回复: 15

B-2如此贵,到底用来干什么的?

[复制链接]
发表于 2016-9-10 07:45:50 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The exotic B-2 is essentially a “hand-made” bomber. Immense amounts of highly skilled labor went into every inch of this remarkable airplane. I’m sure there are other folks here who can detail the B-2’s construction and cost.

[Yes! Thierry Etienne Joseph Rotty below, is that man.]

One of the reasons the plane cost so much is that half way through its design, its mission changed radically: from a high altitude mission “profile” to a low-level one. This added about US$2 billion to the program’s cost and two years to its development.

And that brings us to the last part of your question: “For what exactly is it used?”

You are asking exactly the right question. The B-2 was designed during The Cold War. Its mission was to attack the Soviet Union. But here is where things get, well, a little ridiculous—not a rare condition in military matters.

[Again, see Rotty for fine detail]

The B-2’s job was to penetrate Soviet air defense using its stealth technology. Fine. I’m sure it could do that with flying colors. Once inside the USSR it was supposed to go hunting for mobile missile launchers and other “high value” targets, whatever those might be.

Track down mobile missile launchers? C’mon! We couldn’t find Saddam Hussein’s Scud mobile launchers in the wide open Iraqi desert. Night after night he launched them against Israel with impunity. Yet now the B-2 was expected to prowl the dense Russian taiga and uncover Soviet launchers?

The mission made little sense. What about fuel? Jet aircraft flying at low altitude burn immense amounts of fuel and yet the B-2 was expected to fly about un-re-fueled. I guess the crew was essentially on a high tech kamikaze mission. They had to know they were expendable.

If the B-2 was going in, nuclear war had started. Our land-based and sea-abased ICBMs would be raining megatonnage down on the USSR. And the B-2 was supposed to fly around at low level under all this? “Oh, say, Bob, there’s a mushroom cloud over there. I think we should hang a hard right.”

The Air Force desperately wanted this “revolutionary” new bomber and they wanted 132 of them to be exact. But faced with the controversial program’s stratospheric costs, congress whittled the procurement down to just 21—of which 19 are still flying.

[See photo below for the fate of one. Hank Richards informs me the other is a US$2 billion exhibit at the Air Force Museum, Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton OH]

The B-2 took its first flight just as the Cold War was ending. The USSR was kaputski. Gone. And the B-2 was out of a job. But the Air Force did not want their $2 billion Boondoggles to become hangar queens—each bomber has its very own, luxurious, climate controlled hangar—so they started flying “stunt” missions.

These stunt missions—my term—consisted of taking off from home base, Whiteman AFB in Missouri, and flying non-stop with re-fueling to drop a load of bombs on Iraq, their contribution to the Iraq War. These missions took 24 hours with the bomber airborne all the way.

Very long mission, right? What provisions were made for the two pilots? None. None? That’s right. There’s no bunk in the Boondoggle, not even a cot. So the pilots have to haul a lawn chair along so they can take a nap. US$2 billion a copy and not a dollar spent of crew comfort. It’s preposterous! I would so love to have a chat with one of the Boondoggle’s designers.

It gets worse, much worse. The B-2’s extremely stealthy skin is extremely sensitive. It gets sunburnt easily, which is why the bomber cannot sit out on the ramp like a “normal” Air Force plane. And after a mission? For each hour this bomber flies, it needs 129 hours of highly skilled skin maintenance. [See Rotty] So, you do the math for a 24 hour stunt mission. The plane comes home with its skin in tatters—figuratively speaking. And then its flight surfaces are essentially hand-made all over again.

All for a bomber without a mission.

To compound all this wasteful stupidity, after “Shock & Awe” in which Iraqi air defense was efficiently eliminated by the B-2, there was no further need for its expensive services. The durable B-52, in USAF service for an astounding 61 years, could have done the job at far less cost. Yet the Air Force kept flying its stunt missions.

I must end with this question: what kind of society spends two billion dollars on a useless bomber when that society has so many other pressing non-military needs? What society indeed…

My own suspicion is that Air Force knew the B-2’s mission was something out of Alice in Wonderland. A complete fiction. A fraud. It was never going on that ludicrous hunt for launchers. But oh, Air Force brass had a hard-on for this baby and they had to sell it to congress. Congress, ever fearful of being seen was soft on the Soviets, bought the launcher hunt nonsense. And who got stuck with this disgusting bill…?

.

Photo: US$2 billion of wrecked B-2. Attempting to take off from Guam, the bomber’s computers got, well, a little confused. The crew ejected safely.


.

Graphic: Doesn’t something look a little out of whack? Our defense budget is cancerous! Think of what we could do with that obscene blot of blue. Next time someone starts, “We don’t spend enough on defense,” show them this.

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册

x
许多东西,你放下了,是个永远的困扰,每天都出现,无法避免。
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

316

帖子

5366

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
5366
发表于 2016-9-10 07:53:58 | 显示全部楼层
要提高姿势水平啊,要不我连水都没法灌了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

96

主题

4672

帖子

2万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
27774
发表于 2016-9-10 08:44:59 | 显示全部楼层
用来威慑啊
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

41

主题

799

帖子

6951

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
6951
发表于 2016-9-10 10:36:34 | 显示全部楼层
Where is the photo?I can't see it actually.
B-2 bomber is a weapon designed to complete mission which other AF plane can't do or take much more cost . I think its price is appropriate based on its ability and what it can do. I believe other countries  who want to develop this high-level plane or do B-2's impossible job would cost much more or they just can't .
And I have no idea about why you are so interested in military technology discussion which is far away from our common life and work recently.
I guess you are just in a void and have a lot of time to kill.  So I advise you to try some comment magazines which have unique opinions compared with News report about what happened at present and I'm sure you will like them  .

评分

参与人数 1威望 +50 收起 理由
A龙 + 50

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

4

主题

40

帖子

718

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
718
发表于 2016-9-10 11:48:07 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 海峰之 于 2016-9-10 11:50 编辑

这个机器的样子,希特勒时代就有了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1万

主题

4万

帖子

26万

积分

管理员

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

积分
267237
发表于 2016-9-10 13:51:19 | 显示全部楼层
就是告诉你,别动手啊!谁动手就灭他,你不服,给你张有日期的照片看看,就是告诉你,爷我哪里都随便去,
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

37

主题

1310

帖子

2万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
20899
发表于 2016-9-10 18:15:50 | 显示全部楼层
据说当年南斯拉夫的事情就是B2从阿拉斯加的长途奔袭

点评

多谢八爷,八爷觉得氟橡胶有啥死穴吗?有啥需要特别注意的地方吗?  发表于 2016-9-12 12:55
阀门气动控制我拆开过,那里面有膜片,对寿命有要求,因为动作很频繁,但那个膜片确实没有玩过,弗橡胶做过密封圈,耐高温用的,  发表于 2016-9-12 10:04
谢谢八爷!看到一般是用VITON-A(杜邦的商品名)的材料,一般是气动放大器(volume booster)上,我的应用和这个类似~  发表于 2016-9-12 09:11
弗橡胶我了解,有接触,作为比例阀门的膜片没这么用过,抱歉,要了解一下,看周围谁玩,有详细内容再回复,谢谢  发表于 2016-9-11 14:21
八爷能说说氟橡胶的膜片吗?用于比例阀门上的,压力不高于2MPa的,控制压缩空气和水的,国内的靠谱吗?谢谢!  发表于 2016-9-11 09:36
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

51

主题

2484

帖子

1万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
18410
发表于 2016-9-10 20:21:45 | 显示全部楼层
B2就是尚方宝剑啊。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

10

主题

224

帖子

1250

积分

金牌会员

Rank: 6Rank: 6

积分
1250
发表于 2016-9-14 12:45:10 | 显示全部楼层
层次略高,看不下去了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

QQ|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|机械荟萃山庄 ( 辽ICP备16011317号-1 )

GMT+8, 2024-12-24 08:39 , Processed in 0.107928 second(s), 21 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表